On contact type hypersurfaces in 4-space
Thomas E. Mark, B\"ulent Tosun

TL;DR
This paper uses Heegaard Floer homology to show certain 3-manifolds, like Brieskorn spheres, cannot be contact type hypersurfaces in R^4, revealing new topological constraints in symplectic geometry.
Contribution
It introduces an obstruction based on Heegaard Floer homology that prevents Brieskorn spheres from embedding as contact type hypersurfaces in R^4, advancing understanding of symplectic topology.
Findings
Brieskorn homology spheres cannot be contact type embeddings in R^4.
No rationally convex domain in C^2 has boundary diffeomorphic to a Brieskorn sphere.
Existence of contact 3-manifolds bounding Stein but not symplectically convex domains.
Abstract
We consider constraints on the topology of closed 3-manifolds that can arise as hypersurfaces of contact type in standard symplectic . Using an obstruction derived from Heegaard Floer homology we prove that no Brieskorn homology sphere admits a contact type embedding in , a result that has bearing on conjectures of Gompf and Koll\'ar. This implies in particular that no rationally convex domain in has boundary diffeomorphic to a Brieskorn sphere. We also give infinitely many examples of contact 3-manifolds that bound Stein domains but not symplectically convex ones; in particular we find Stein domains in that cannot be made Weinstein with respect to the ambient symplectic structure while preserving the contact structure on their boundaries.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
