On the Size Control of the Hybrid Test for Predictive Ability
Deborah Kim

TL;DR
This paper examines the limitations of the hybrid test for predictive ability, revealing its potential invalidity at common significance levels and proposing a modified, more reliable version.
Contribution
It identifies the asymptotic invalidity of the hybrid test and introduces a modified test with proven asymptotic validity.
Findings
Hybrid test may reject more than 11% at 5% significance level.
Pointwise asymptotic invalidity persists under reasonable conditions.
Modified hybrid test achieves asymptotic validity.
Abstract
We analyze theoretical properties of the hybrid test for superior predictability. We demonstrate with a simple example that the test may not be pointwise asymptotically of level at commonly used significance levels and may lead to rejection rates over when the significance level is . Generalizing this observation, we provide a formal result that pointwise asymptotic invalidity of the hybrid test persists in a setting under reasonable conditions. As an easy alternative, we propose a modified hybrid test based on the generalized moment selection method and show that the modified test enjoys pointwise asymptotic validity. Monte Carlo simulations support the theoretical findings.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStatistical Methods and Inference · Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling · Fault Detection and Control Systems
