Proof complexity and the binary encoding of combinatorial principles
Stefan Dantchev, Nicola Galesi, Abdul Ghani, Barnaby Martin

TL;DR
This paper investigates how binary encoding of combinatorial principles affects proof complexity across various refutation systems, contrasting it with traditional unary encoding methods.
Contribution
It introduces an analysis of proof complexity differences between binary and unary encodings in Resolution and Integer Linear Programming systems.
Findings
Binary encoding impacts proof complexity significantly.
Differences observed between unary and binary encodings in refutation systems.
Provides insights into encoding choices for proof complexity analysis.
Abstract
We consider Proof Complexity in light of the unusual binary encoding of certain combinatorial principles. We contrast this Proof Complexity with the normal unary encoding in several refutation systems, based on Resolution and Integer Linear Programming. Please consult the article for the full abstract.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBenford’s Law and Fraud Detection · Advanced Algebra and Logic · semigroups and automata theory
