Quality assessment of MEG-to-MRI coregistrations
Hermann Sonntag, Jens Haueisen, Burkhard Maess

TL;DR
This study evaluates the quality of MEG-to-MRI coregistrations, proposing TRE as a more reliable metric than RMS residuals, and demonstrates the effectiveness of the Metropolis algorithm for improved coregistration accuracy.
Contribution
It introduces TRE as a new quality measure for coregistration and advocates for the Metropolis algorithm to enhance accuracy in MEG-to-MRI alignment.
Findings
Average TRE between 1.3 and 2.3mm at the head surface.
Metropolis algorithm significantly improves coregistration quality.
Sampled parameters enable TRE computation across MRI volume.
Abstract
For high precision in source reconstruction of magnetoencephalography (MEG) or electroencephalography data, high accuracy of the coregistration of sources and sensors is mandatory. Usually, the source space is derived from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In most cases, however, no quality assessment is reported for sensor-to-MRI coregistrations. If any, typically root mean squares (RMS) of point residuals are provided. It has been shown, however, that RMS of residuals do not correlate with coregistration errors. We suggest using target registration error (TRE) as criterion for the quality of sensor-to-MRI coregistrations. TRE measures the effect of uncertainty in coregistrations at all points of interest. In total, 5544 data sets with sensor-to-head and 128 head-to-MRI coregistrations, from a single MEG laboratory, were analyzed. An adaptive Metropolis algorithm was used to estimate…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
