On the Generalizability of Neural Program Models with respect to Semantic-Preserving Program Transformations

TL;DR

This paper evaluates how well neural program models generalize to semantically equivalent programs with different syntax, revealing limitations and potential improvements for source code analysis tasks.

Contribution

It introduces a method to assess neural program models' generalizability using semantic-preserving transformations and compares multiple models across datasets.

Findings

Neural models often fail to generalize after semantic-preserving changes.

Models based on data and control dependencies perform better than syntax-only models.

Larger and more diverse training datasets improve model generalizability.

Abstract

With the prevalence of publicly available source code repositories to train deep neural network models, neural program models can do well in source code analysis tasks such as predicting method names in given programs that cannot be easily done by traditional program analysis techniques. Although such neural program models have been tested on various existing datasets, the extent to which they generalize to unforeseen source code is largely unknown. Since it is very challenging to test neural program models on all unforeseen programs, in this paper, we propose to evaluate the generalizability of neural program models with respect to semantic-preserving transformations: a generalizable neural program model should perform equally well on programs that are of the same semantics but of different lexical appearances and syntactical structures. We compare the results of various neural program models for the method name prediction task on programs before and after automated semantic-preserving transformations. We use three Java datasets of different sizes and three state-of-the-art neural network models for code, namely code2vec, code2seq, and GGNN, to build nine such neural program models for evaluation. Our results show that even with small semantically preserving changes to the programs, these neural program models often fail to generalize their performance. Our results also suggest that neural program models based on data and control dependencies in programs generalize better than neural program models based only on abstract syntax trees. On the positive side, we observe that as the size of the training dataset grows and diversifies the generalizability of correct predictions produced by the neural program models can be improved too. Our results on the generalizability of neural program models provide insights to measure their limitations and provide a stepping stone for their improvement.