Are models of local hidden variables for the singlet polarization state necessarily constrained by the Bell inequality?

TL;DR

This paper challenges the assumption that all local hidden variable models constrained by Bell inequality are physically plausible, by identifying a subtle feature they share that is not required by fundamental principles and constructing a model that reproduces quantum predictions without this feature.

Contribution

The authors reveal a hidden assumption in Bell inequality models and develop a local hidden variable model that aligns with quantum mechanics without this assumption.

Findings

Identified a non-physical feature in Bell inequality models.

Constructed a local hidden variable model matching quantum predictions.

Showed Bell inequality constraints are not universally applicable.

Abstract

The Bell inequality is thought to be a common constraint shared by all models of local hidden variables that aim to describe the entangled states of two qubits. Since the inequality is violated by the quantum mechanical description of these states, it purportedly allows distinguishing in an experimentally testable way the predictions of quantum mechanics from those of models of local hidden variables and, ultimately, ruling the latter out. In this paper, we show, however, that the models of local hidden variables constrained by the Bell inequality all share a subtle, though crucial, feature that is not required by fundamental physical principles and, hence, it might not be fulfilled in the actual experimental setup that tests the inequality. Indeed, the disputed feature neither can be properly implemented within the standard framework of quantum mechanics and it is even at odds with the fundamental principle of relativity. Namely, the proof of the inequality requires the existence of a preferred absolute frame of reference (supposedly provided by the lab) with respect to which the hidden properties of the entangled particles and the orientations of each one of the measurement devices that test them can be independently defined through a long sequence of realizations of the experiment. We notice, however, that while the relative orientation between the two measurement devices is a properly defined physical magnitude in every single realization of the experiment, their global rigid orientation with respect to a lab frame is a spurious gauge degree of freedom. Following this observation, we were able to explicitly build a model of local hidden variables that does not share the disputed feature and, hence, it is able to reproduce the predictions of quantum mechanics for the entangled states of two qubits.