Facets of Fairness in Search and Recommendation
Sahil Verma, Ruoyuan Gao, Chirag Shah

TL;DR
This paper reviews recent research on fairness in search and recommendation systems, discussing definitions, measures, and gaps to promote balanced and unbiased content delivery.
Contribution
It provides a comparative analysis of fairness concepts and highlights gaps in current frameworks for evaluating fairness in recommendation systems.
Findings
Identifies different fairness measures and their applications.
Highlights gaps and inconsistencies in current fairness evaluation frameworks.
Emphasizes the importance of balancing relevance, diversity, and fairness.
Abstract
Several recent works have highlighted how search and recommender systems exhibit bias along different dimensions. Counteracting this bias and bringing a certain amount of fairness in search is crucial to not only creating a more balanced environment that considers relevance and diversity but also providing a more sustainable way forward for both content consumers and content producers. This short paper examines some of the recent works to define relevance, diversity, and related concepts. Then, it focuses on explaining the emerging concept of fairness in various recommendation settings. In doing so, this paper presents comparisons and highlights contracts among various measures, and gaps in our conceptual and evaluative frameworks.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEthics and Social Impacts of AI · Auction Theory and Applications · Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing
