Public risk perception and emotion on Twitter during the Covid-19 pandemic
Joel Dyer, Blas Kolic

TL;DR
This study analyzes 20 million Covid-19-related tweets to understand how public risk perception and emotion evolved during the pandemic, revealing psychophysical numbing and the applicability of sensory perception models.
Contribution
It introduces a large-scale social media analysis linking public emotion, attention, and epidemiological data to monitor risk perception in real-time.
Findings
Twitter users fixate more on mortality but become less emotional over time.
Semantic analysis shows changing emotional framing of Covid-19 casualties.
Attention to mortality rates follows Weber-Fechner and power law functions.
Abstract
Successful navigation of the Covid-19 pandemic is predicated on public cooperation with safety measures and appropriate perception of risk, in which emotion and attention play important roles. Signatures of public emotion and attention are present in social media data, thus natural language analysis of this text enables near-to-real-time monitoring of indicators of public risk perception. We compare key epidemiological indicators of the progression of the pandemic with indicators of the public perception of the pandemic constructed from ~20 million unique Covid-19-related tweets from 12 countries posted between 10th March -- 14th June 2020. We find evidence of psychophysical numbing: Twitter users increasingly fixate on mortality, but in a decreasingly emotional and increasingly analytic tone. Semantic network analysis based on word co-occurrences reveals changes in the emotional…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
