SemEval-2020 Task 5: Counterfactual Recognition
Xiaoyu Yang, Stephen Obadinma, Huasha Zhao, Qiong Zhang, Stan Matwin,, Xiaodan Zhu

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new benchmark task for recognizing and extracting counterfactual statements in natural language, with two subtasks focusing on identification and extraction of antecedents and consequents.
Contribution
It defines the first shared task on counterfactual recognition, providing datasets, baseline code, and evaluation metrics to advance research in this area.
Findings
27 submissions to Subtask-1
11 submissions to Subtask-2
Benchmark resources publicly available
Abstract
We present a counterfactual recognition (CR) task, the shared Task 5 of SemEval-2020. Counterfactuals describe potential outcomes (consequents) produced by actions or circumstances that did not happen or cannot happen and are counter to the facts (antecedent). Counterfactual thinking is an important characteristic of the human cognitive system; it connects antecedents and consequents with causal relations. Our task provides a benchmark for counterfactual recognition in natural language with two subtasks. Subtask-1 aims to determine whether a given sentence is a counterfactual statement or not. Subtask-2 requires the participating systems to extract the antecedent and consequent in a given counterfactual statement. During the SemEval-2020 official evaluation period, we received 27 submissions to Subtask-1 and 11 to Subtask-2. The data, baseline code, and leaderboard can be found at…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsTopic Modeling · Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) · Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
MethodsCounterfactuals Explanations
