Tree pivot-minors and linear rank-width
Konrad K. Dabrowski, Fran\c{c}ois Dross, Jisu Jeong, Mamadou, Moustapha Kant\'e, O-joung Kwon, Sang-il Oum, Dani\"el Paulusma

TL;DR
This paper investigates the relationship between tree structures and the boundedness of linear rank-width in graphs, revealing that certain tree minors influence graph complexity and providing partial classifications for specific tree types.
Contribution
It proves that non-caterpillar trees do not guarantee bounded linear rank-width in pivot-minor-free graphs and offers partial results for caterpillars and small trees, advancing understanding of graph minor relations.
Findings
Non-caterpillar trees do not ensure bounded linear rank-width.
Bounded linear rank-width holds for $T$-pivot-minor-free distance-hereditary graphs if and only if $T$ is a caterpillar.
The class of $(K_3,S_{1,2,2})$-free graphs has bounded linear rank-width.
Abstract
Tree-width and its linear variant path-width play a central role for the graph minor relation. In particular, Robertson and Seymour (1983) proved that for every tree~, the class of graphs that do not contain as a minor has bounded path-width. For the pivot-minor relation, rank-width and linear rank-width take over the role from tree-width and path-width. As such, it is natural to examine if for every tree~, the class of graphs that do not contain as a pivot-minor has bounded linear rank-width. We first prove that this statement is false whenever is a tree that is not a caterpillar. We conjecture that the statement is true if is a caterpillar. We are also able to give partial confirmation of this conjecture by proving: (1) for every tree , the class of -pivot-minor-free distance-hereditary graphs has bounded linear rank-width if and only if is a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
