Forbidden Induced Subgraphs and the {\L}o\'s-Tarski Theorem
Yijia Chen, Joerg Flum

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that the classical correspondence between definability in first-order logic and forbidden induced subgraphs fails for finite graphs, showing limitations in characterizations and computability of such classes.
Contribution
It proves the existence of FO-definable graph classes with no finite forbidden subgraph characterization and shows the non-computability of such characterizations from FO sentences.
Findings
Existence of FO-definable classes with no finite forbidden subgraph characterization
Incomputability of characterizations from FO sentences
Limitations of the { extL}o{ extS}-Tarski Theorem for finite graphs
Abstract
Let be a class of finite and infinite graphs that is closed under induced subgraphs. The well-known {\L}o\'s-Tarski Theorem from classical model theory implies that is definable in first-order logic (FO) by a sentence if and only if has a finite set of forbidden induced finite subgraphs. It provides a powerful tool to show nontrivial characterizations of graphs of small vertex cover, of bounded tree-depth, of bounded shrub-depth, etc. in terms of forbidden induced finite subgraphs. Furthermore, by the Completeness Theorem, we can compute from the corresponding forbidden induced subgraphs. We show that this machinery fails on finite graphs. - There is a class of finite graphs which is definable in FO and closed under induced subgraphs but has no finite set of forbidden induced subgraphs. - Even if we only…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Topology and Set Theory · Advanced Graph Theory Research · Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
