RoboTed: a case study in Ethical Risk Assessment
Alan F.T. Winfield, Katie Winkle

TL;DR
This paper introduces Ethical Risk Assessment (ERA) as an extension of traditional risk assessment, demonstrated through a case study of RoboTed, a smart robot toy, highlighting its role in promoting ethical and sustainable robotics.
Contribution
The paper presents ERA within Responsible Robotics and illustrates its application through a detailed case study of RoboTed, emphasizing ethical considerations in robot design.
Findings
ERA helps identify ethical risks in robotics
Design changes based on ERA improve robot ethics
Case study demonstrates practical value of ERA
Abstract
Risk Assessment is a well known and powerful method for discovering and mitigating risks, and hence improving safety. Ethical Risk Assessment uses the same approach but extends the envelope of risk to cover ethical risks in addition to safety risks. In this paper we outline Ethical Risk Assessment (ERA) and set ERA within the broader framework of Responsible Robotics. We then illustrate ERA with a case study of a hypothetical smart robot toy teddy bear: RoboTed. The case study shows the value of ERA and how consideration of ethical risks can prompt design changes, resulting in a more ethical and sustainable robot.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEthics and Social Impacts of AI · Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management · Open Source Software Innovations
