Poynting vector, super-Poynting vector, and principal observers in electromagnetism and general relativity
Lode Wylleman, L. Filipe O. Costa, Jos\'e Nat\'ario

TL;DR
This paper explores the concept of principal observers in electromagnetism and general relativity, analyzing their properties, relationships, and algorithms for identification, with a focus on the Poynting and super-Poynting vectors across different field types.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive survey of principal observers, establishes their relation to arbitrary observers, and introduces algorithms to identify them based on electromagnetic and gravitational field data.
Findings
Principal observers exist for non-null electromagnetic and certain gravitational fields.
Super-Poynting vector analogy holds for Petrov type D but only partially for type I.
In Petrov type D Einstein-Maxwell fields, Poynting and super-Poynting vectors are aligned, and principal observers coincide.
Abstract
In electromagnetism, the concept of Poynting vector as measured by an observer is well known. A mathematical analogue in general relativity is the super-Poynting vector of the Weyl tensor. Observers for which the (super-)Poynting vector vanishes are called principal. When, at a given point, the electromagnetic field is non-null, or the gravitational field is of Weyl-Petrov type I or D, principal observers instantaneously passing through that point always exist. We survey characterizations of such observers and study their relation to arbitrary observers. In the non-null electromagnetic case it is known that, given any observer, there is a principal observer which moves relative to the first in the direction of his Poynting vector. Replacing Poynting by super-Poynting yields a possible gravitational analogue; we show that this analogy indeed holds for any observer when the Petrov type is…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
