Contrasting lattice geometry dependent versus independent quantities: ramifications for Berry curvature, energy gaps, and dynamics
Steven H. Simon, Mark S. Rudner

TL;DR
This paper introduces the concept of geometry-independence in lattice systems, distinguishing quantities based on their dependence on orbital geometry, and explores implications for Berry curvature, energy gaps, and Hall responses.
Contribution
It defines geometry-independence for physical quantities in lattice systems and applies this concept to analyze Berry curvature, energy gaps, and Hall responses, providing new insights.
Findings
Band structure and Chern numbers are geometry-independent.
Berry curvature is geometry-dependent.
Hall response measurements can differ based on their geometry dependence.
Abstract
In the tight-binding description of electronic, photonic, or cold atomic dynamics in a periodic lattice potential, particle motion is described in terms of hopping amplitudes and potentials on an abstract network of discrete sites corresponding to physical orbitals in the lattice. The physical attributes of the orbitals, including their locations in three-dimensional space, are independent pieces of information. In this paper we identify a notion of geometry-independence: any physical quantity or observable that depends only on the tight-binding parameters (and not on the explicit information about the orbital geometry) is said to be "geometry-independent." The band structure itself, and for example the Chern numbers of the bands in a two-dimensional system, are geometry-independent, while the Bloch-band Berry curvature is geometry-dependent. Careful identification of geometry-dependent…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
