Characterising the target selection pipeline for the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument Bright Galaxy Survey
Omar Ruiz-Macias, Pauline Zarrouk, Shaun Cole, Carlton M. Baugh, Peder, Norberg, John Lucey, Arjun Dey, Daniel J. Eisenstein, Peter Doel, Enrique, Gazta\~naga, ChangHoon Hahn, Robert Kehoe, Ellie Kitanidis, Martin Landriau,, Dustin Lang, John Moustakas, Adam D. Myers

TL;DR
This paper details the development of a reliable galaxy target selection pipeline for the DESI Bright Galaxy Survey, addressing key issues like star-galaxy separation and contamination, and validating the catalogue's completeness and clustering performance.
Contribution
It introduces a new target selection method using Gaia photometry and implements masks to reduce spurious objects, improving the reliability of the galaxy catalogue for DESI BGS.
Findings
Achieved a 7% suppression of target density in high stellar density regions.
Validated the catalogue's clustering by comparison with mock and SDSS data.
Assessed the completeness and systematic effects in the target selection process.
Abstract
We present the steps taken to produce a reliable and complete input galaxy catalogue for the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) Bright Galaxy Survey (BGS) using the photometric Legacy Survey DR8 DECam. We analyse some of the main issues faced in the selection of targets for the DESI BGS, such as star-galaxy separation, contamination by fragmented stars and bright galaxies. Our pipeline utilizes a new way to select BGS galaxies using Gaia photometry and we implement geometrical and photometric masks that reduce the number of spurious objects. The resulting catalogue is cross-matched with the Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA) survey to assess the completeness of the galaxy catalogue and the performance of the target selection. We also validate the clustering of the sources in our BGS catalogue by comparing with mock catalogues and the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) data. Finally,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
