Mitigating contamination in LSS surveys: a comparison of methods
Noah Weaverdyck, Dragan Huterer

TL;DR
This paper compares existing methods for removing systematic contamination in large scale structure surveys, introduces new mitigation techniques, and evaluates their performance on simulated data to improve cosmological measurements.
Contribution
It provides a unified regression framework for systematic removal methods, proposes two new mitigation techniques, and demonstrates their effectiveness on simulated survey data.
Findings
Proposed methods yield cleaner maps and power spectra.
New techniques are simpler to implement with minimal tuning.
Methods are robust across various analysis scenarios.
Abstract
Future large scale structure surveys will measure the locations and shapes of billions of galaxies. The precision of such catalogs will require meticulous treatment of systematic contamination of the observed fields. We compare several existing methods for removing such systematics from galaxy clustering measurements. We show how all the methods, including the popular pseudo- Mode Projection and Template Subtraction methods, can be interpreted under a common regression framework and use this to suggest improved estimators. We show how methods designed to mitigate systematics in the power spectrum can be used to produce clean maps, which are necessary for cosmological analyses beyond the power spectrum, and we extend current methods to treat the next-order multiplicative contamination in observed maps and power spectra. Two new mitigation methods are proposed, which incorporate…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
