Modelling light curves of bipolar core collapse supernovae from the equatorial plane
Noam Soker, Noa Kaplan (Technion, Israel)

TL;DR
This paper models the light curves of bipolar core collapse supernovae, suggesting that jets shape the ejecta and that a significant fraction of CCSNe exhibit bipolar morphology, especially in hydrogen-deficient cases.
Contribution
It introduces a bipolar toy model to fit supernova light curves, linking bipolar morphology to jet-driven explosions and estimating the prevalence of such structures among CCSNe.
Findings
Bipolar ejecta increase maximum luminosity and steepen decline for equatorial observers.
SN 2018gk likely resulted from a jet-driven explosion with energy > neutrino-driven limits.
Approximately 5-15% of CCSNe exhibit pronounced bipolar morphology.
Abstract
We use the two-components bipolar toy model of core collapse supernova (CCSN) ejecta to fit the rapid decline from maximum luminosity in the light curve of the type IIb CCSN SN 2018gk (ASASSN-18am). In this toy model we use a template light curve from a different CCSN that is similar to SN 2018gk, but that has no rapid drop in its light curve. The bipolar morphology that we model with a polar ejecta and an equatorial ejecta increases the maximum luminosity and causes a steeper decline for an equatorial observer, relative to a similar spherical explosion. The total energy and mass of our toy model for SN 2018gk are E=5e51 erg and M=2.7Mo. This explosion energy is more than what a neutrino-driven explosion mechanism can supply, implying that jets exploded SN 2018gk. These energetic jets likely shaped the ejecta to a bipolar morphology, as our toy model requires. We crudely estimate that…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
