Understanding controlled EV charging impacts using scenario-based forecasting models

TL;DR

This paper develops scenario-based forecasting models to analyze the impact of controlled EV charging on electricity infrastructure, considering diverse EV types and partial control regimes, to inform better grid management strategies.

Contribution

It introduces a minimalistic scenario-based approach incorporating diverse EV charging behaviors and types, evaluating different control regimes' effects on transformer load.

Findings

At least 60% control is needed to prevent transformer overloads during peak hours.

Advanced machine learning models outperform simple regression in forecasting EV charging impacts.

Partial control regimes can effectively mitigate grid stress when full control is not feasible.

Abstract

Electrification of transport is a key strategy in reducing carbon emissions. Many countries have adopted policies of complete but gradual transformation to electric vehicles (EVs). However, mass EV adoption also means a spike in load (kW), which in turn can disrupt existing electricity infrastructure. Smart or controlled charging is widely seen as a potential solution to alleviate this stress on existing networks. Learning from the recent EV trials in the UK and elsewhere we take into account two key aspects which are largely ignored in current research: EVs actually charging at any given time and wide range of EV types, especially battery capacity-wise. Taking a minimalistic scenario-based approach, we study forecasting models for mean number of active chargers and mean EV consumption for distinct scenarios. Focusing on residential charging the models we consider range from simple regression models to more advanced machine and deep learning models such as XGBoost and LSTMs. We then use these models to evaluate the impacts of different levels of future EV penetration on a specimen distribution transformer that captures typical real-world scenarios. In doing so, we also initiate the study of different types of controlled charging when fully controlled charging is not possible. This aligns with the outcomes from recent trials which show that a sizeable proportion of EV owners may not prefer fully controlled centralized charging. We study two possible control regimes and show that one is more beneficial from load-on-transformer point of view, while the other may be preferred for other objectives. We show that a minimum of 60% control is required to ensure that transformers are not overloaded during peak hours.