Evaluation of Federated Learning in Phishing Email Detection

TL;DR

This paper investigates the effectiveness of federated learning for phishing email detection using deep neural networks, analyzing performance under various data distributions and organizational settings, and highlighting its potential and limitations.

Contribution

It is the first study to evaluate federated learning in email anti-phishing, comparing its performance to centralized models and analyzing effects of data distribution and organizational count.

Findings

Federated learning achieves comparable performance to centralized models on balanced datasets.

Increasing organizational count can decrease accuracy for RNN but improve BERT performance.

FL convergence speed improves with more organizations and data, but performance suffers with highly asymmetric data distributions.

Abstract

The use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) to detect phishing emails is primarily dependent on large-scale centralized datasets, which opens it up to a myriad of privacy, trust, and legal issues. Moreover, organizations are loathed to share emails, given the risk of leakage of commercially sensitive information. So, it is uncommon to obtain sufficient emails to train a global AI model efficiently. Accordingly, privacy-preserving distributed and collaborative machine learning, particularly Federated Learning (FL), is a desideratum. Already prevalent in the healthcare sector, questions remain regarding the effectiveness and efficacy of FL-based phishing detection within the context of multi-organization collaborations. To the best of our knowledge, the work herein is the first to investigate the use of FL in email anti-phishing. This paper builds upon a deep neural network model, particularly RNN and BERT for phishing email detection. It analyzes the FL-entangled learning performance under various settings, including balanced and asymmetrical data distribution. Our results corroborate comparable performance statistics of FL in phishing email detection to centralized learning for balanced datasets, and low organization counts. Moreover, we observe a variation in performance when increasing organizational counts. For a fixed total email dataset, the global RNN based model suffers by a 1.8% accuracy drop when increasing organizational counts from 2 to 10. In contrast, BERT accuracy rises by 0.6% when going from 2 to 5 organizations. However, if we allow increasing the overall email dataset with the introduction of new organizations in the FL framework, the organizational level performance is improved by achieving a faster convergence speed. Besides, FL suffers in its overall global model performance due to highly unstable outputs if the email dataset distribution is highly asymmetric.