
TL;DR
This paper explores resource augmentation, comparing algorithm performance with limited resources across three case studies, and discusses bounds that show near-optimal performance for most resource levels.
Contribution
It introduces resource augmentation bounds and applies them to online paging, selfish routing, and scheduling, highlighting their implications for algorithm performance.
Findings
Resource augmentation bounds provide near-optimal performance guarantees.
Application to online paging, selfish routing, and scheduling demonstrates broad relevance.
Loosely competitive bounds imply algorithms perform well across most resource levels.
Abstract
This chapter introduces resource augmentation, in which the performance of an algorithm is compared to the best-possible solution that is handicapped by less resources. We consider three case studies: online paging, with cache size as the resource; selfish routing, with capacity as the resource; and scheduling, with processor speed as the resource. Resource augmentation bounds also imply "loosely competitive" bounds, which show that an algorithm's performance is near-optimal for most resource levels.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsOptimization and Search Problems · Caching and Content Delivery · Advanced Bandit Algorithms Research
