Diverse Jet Structures Consistent with the Off-axis Afterglow of GRB 170817A
Kazuya Takahashi, Kunihito Ioka

TL;DR
This paper introduces an inversion method to reconstruct diverse jet structures of short gamma-ray bursts from off-axis afterglow data, revealing multiple consistent configurations and degeneracies, and emphasizing the importance of spectral observations for detailed jet characterization.
Contribution
The authors developed a novel inversion technique that reconstructs jet structures without assuming a specific functional form, allowing for more flexible modeling of GRB jets.
Findings
Multiple jet structures (hollow-cone, spindle, Gaussian, power-law) fit the observed afterglow within errors.
The total jet energy is degenerate with ambient density and microphysics parameters, following a specific scaling relation.
Spectral breaks and viewing angles can break degeneracies and help determine the jet shape more precisely.
Abstract
The jet structure of short gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) has been controversial after the detection of GRB 170817A as the electromagnetic counterparts to the gravitational wave event GW170817. Different authors use different jet structures for calculating the afterglow light curves. We formulated a method to inversely reconstruct a jet structure from a given off-axis GRB afterglow, without assuming any functional form of the structure. By systematically applying our inversion method, we find that more diverse jet structures are consistent with the observed afterglow of GRB 170817A within errors: such as hollow-cone, spindle, Gaussian, and power-law jet structures. In addition, the total energy of the reconstructed jet is arbitrary, proportional to the ambient density , with keeping the same jet shape if the parameters satisfy the degeneracy combination $n_0…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
