Exploring AGN and Star Formation Activity of Massive Galaxies at Cosmic Noon
Jonathan Florez, Shardha Jogee, Sydney Sherman, Matthew L. Stevans,, Steven L. Finkelstein, Casey Papovich, Lalitwadee Kawinwanichakij, Robin, Ciardullo, Caryl Gronwall, C. Megan Urry, Allison Kirkpatrick, Stephanie M., LaMassa, Tonima Tasnim Ananna, Isak Wold

TL;DR
This study examines the relationship between AGN activity and star formation in massive galaxies at cosmic noon, revealing that most AGN hosts are not quenched and that high SFRs often coexist with luminous AGN phases.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive analysis of AGN and star formation activity using multi-wavelength data and SED fitting, highlighting the importance of including AGN emission in mass and SFR estimates.
Findings
Most X-ray luminous AGN hosts are not quenched in star formation.
High SFRs and luminous AGN activity often coexist, indicating shared fueling mechanisms.
Neglecting AGN emission leads to overestimating stellar masses and SFRs in host galaxies.
Abstract
We investigate the relation between AGN and star formation (SF) activity at by analyzing 898 galaxies with X-ray luminous AGN ( erg s) and a large comparison sample of galaxies without X-ray luminous AGN. Our samples are selected from a large (11.8 deg) area in Stripe 82 that has multi-wavelength (X-ray to far-IR) data. The enormous comoving volume ( Gpc) at minimizes the effects of cosmic variance and captures a large number of massive galaxies ( galaxies with ) and X-ray luminous AGN. While many galaxy studies discard AGN hosts, we fit the SED of galaxies with and without X-ray luminous AGN with Code Investigating GALaxy Emission (CIGALE) and include AGN emission templates. We find that without this inclusion, stellar masses and star formation rates (SFRs) in AGN…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
