Two-way Greedy: Algorithms for Imperfect Rationality
Diodato Ferraioli, Paolo Penna, Carmine Ventre

TL;DR
This paper introduces the two-way greedy paradigm, linking obvious strategyproofness in binary allocation problems to a combination of forward and reverse greedy algorithms, enhancing understanding and design of OSP mechanisms.
Contribution
It establishes a novel connection between OSP and two-way greedy algorithms, providing structural characterizations and approximation bounds for OSP mechanisms.
Findings
OSP mechanisms are fully characterized by two-way greedy algorithms.
Cycle monotonicity is used to analyze OSP mechanisms.
Structural properties of cycles and queries improve mechanism design.
Abstract
The realization that selfish interests need to be accounted for in the design of algorithms has produced many contributions in computer science under the umbrella of algorithmic mechanism design. Novel algorithmic properties and paradigms have been identified and studied. Our work stems from the observation that selfishness is different from rationality; agents will attempt to strategize whenever they perceive it to be convenient according to their imperfect rationality. Recent work has focused on a particular notion of imperfect rationality, namely absence of contingent reasoning skills, and defined obvious strategyproofness (OSP) as a way to deal with the selfishness of these agents. Essentially, this definition states that to care for the incentives of these agents, we need not only pay attention about the relationship between input and output, but also about the way the algorithm is…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
