TL;DR
This paper investigates the nonclosedness of neural network sets in Sobolev spaces, revealing limitations in their approximation capabilities and providing insights into parameter growth and training performance.
Contribution
It demonstrates that neural network sets are not closed in Sobolev spaces, characterizes parameter growth rates, and shows neural networks can approximate non-network functions with increasing parameters.
Findings
Neural network sets are not closed in Sobolev spaces $W^{m-1,p}$ and $W^{m,p}$.
Sequences of neural networks can approximate functions outside the network realizations.
Networks can closely approximate non-network target functions with increasing parameters.
Abstract
We examine the closedness of sets of realized neural networks of a fixed architecture in Sobolev spaces. For an exactly -times differentiable activation function , we construct a sequence of neural networks whose realizations converge in order- Sobolev norm to a function that cannot be realized exactly by a neural network. Thus, sets of realized neural networks are not closed in order- Sobolev spaces for . We further show that these sets are not closed in under slightly stronger conditions on the -th derivative of . For a real analytic activation function, we show that sets of realized neural networks are not closed in for any . The nonclosedness allows for approximation of non-network target functions with unbounded parameter growth. We partially…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
