Estimating supermassive black hole masses in AGNs using polarization of broad MgII, H${\alpha}$ and H${\beta}$ lines
{\DJ}or{\dj}e Savi\'c, Luka \v{C}. Popovi\'c, Elena Shablovinskaya and, Viktor L. Afanasiev

TL;DR
This study extends a polarization-based method for estimating supermassive black hole masses in AGNs to include the Mg II emission line, using advanced modeling to account for inflows and outflows in the broad line region.
Contribution
It is the first application of polarization measurements to Mg II lines for SMBH mass estimation, incorporating 3D radiative transfer modeling with inflows and outflows.
Findings
Polarization states of Hα and Hβ are nearly identical with 7% mass estimate difference.
Mg II polarization angle shows a plateau, deviating from pure Keplerian profiles.
SMBH mass estimates from Mg II are up to 35% higher than from Hα and Hβ lines.
Abstract
For type-1 active galactic nuclei (AGNs) for which the equatorial scattering is the dominant broad line polarization mechanism, it is possible to measure the supermassive black hole mass by tracing the Keplerian motion across the polarization plane positionangle. So far this method has been used for 30 objects but only for H emission line. We explore the possibilities this method for determining SMBH masses using polarization in broad emission lines by applying it for the first time to Mg II2798AA spectral line. We use 3D Monte Carlo radiative transfer code stokes for simultaneous modeling of equatorial scattering of H, H and Mg II lines. We included vertical inflows and outflows in the MgII broad line region (BLR). We find that polarization states of H and H lines are almost identical and SMBH mass estimates differ by 7%. For…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
