Assembly Conformity of Structure Growth: Fossil versus Normal Groups of Galaxies
Zack Li, Renyue Cen

TL;DR
This study uses semi-analytic modeling to explore how fossil galaxy groups differ from normal groups in their assembly history and stellar content, revealing an 'Assembly Conformity' effect that influences their evolution.
Contribution
It introduces the concept of 'Assembly Conformity' to explain the early assembly and stellar deficiency in fossil groups compared to normal groups.
Findings
Fossil groups assemble earlier than normal groups.
Assembly Conformity accounts for 70% of stellar content differences.
Fossil groups have higher central galaxy masses and negative stellar age gradients.
Abstract
Using a semi-analytic method calibrated to the global star formation history and the stellar mass function at , we attempt to understand the most stellar deficient galaxy groups. We argue such groups are a kind of fossil group (FGs) -- in comparison to the normal groups of galaxies, they assemble both halo and stellar mass earlier. We find there is a central galaxy and satellite conformity between these FGs and normal groups: centrals and satellites in the former form earlier and more stellar deficient than their counterparts of the latter. We term this effect "Assembly Conformity" of dark matter halos. This effect accounts for about 70 percent of the difference in stellar content between FGs and normal groups. When split by the peak redshift for the star formation rate of a group, the mass functions of satellite halos on either side of the peak redshift are found to be…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
