Reference study of CityGML software support: the GeoBIM benchmark 2019 -- Part II
Francesca Noardo, Ken Arroyo Ohori, Filip Biljecki, Claire Ellul, Lars, Harrie, Thomas Krijnen, Helen Eriksson, Jordi van Liempt, Maria Pla, Antonio, Ruiz, Dean Hintz, Nina Krueger, Cristina Leoni, Leire Leoz, Diana Moraru,, Stelios Vitalis, Philipp Willkomm, Jantien Stoter

TL;DR
This paper presents the GeoBIM benchmark 2019, systematically analyzing CityGML software support issues through volunteer reports to identify critical points and improve interoperability in 3D city modeling.
Contribution
It provides the first systematic investigation of CityGML implementation problems based on empirical data from a large-scale benchmark study.
Findings
Identified key issues in CityGML data handling and software support
Highlighted critical points for future standard development
Compared CityGML and IFC standards in building information modeling
Abstract
OGC CityGML is an open standard for 3D city models intended to foster interoperability and support various applications. However, through our practical experience and discussions with practitioners, we have noticed several problems related to the implementation of the standard and the use of standardized data. Nevertheless, a systematic investigation of these issues has never been performed, and there is thus insufficient evidence that can be used for tackling the problems. The GeoBIM benchmark project is aimed at finding such evidence by involving external volunteers, reporting on tools behaviour about relevant aspects (geometry, semantics, georeferencing, functionalities), analysed and described in this paper. This study explicitly pointed out the critical points embedded in the format as an evidence base for future development. This paper is in tandem with Part I, describing the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
