Majorisation as a theory for uncertainty
Victoria Volodina, Nikki Sonenberg, Edward Wheatcroft, Henry Wynn

TL;DR
This paper proposes majorisation as a comprehensive theoretical framework for quantifying and comparing uncertainty across various distributions and real-world applications like climate and energy systems.
Contribution
It introduces operations based on majorisation to analyze uncertainty and demonstrates their effectiveness through diverse examples.
Findings
Majorisation provides a consistent way to compare uncertainties.
The approach applies to climate projections and energy systems.
Operational tools for uncertainty assessment are developed.
Abstract
Majorisation, also called rearrangement inequalities, yields a type of stochastic ordering in which two or more distributions can be compared. In this paper we argue that majorisation is a good candidate as a theory for uncertainty. We present operations that can be applied to study uncertainty in a range of settings and demonstrate our approach to assessing uncertainty with examples from well known distributions and from applications of climate projections and energy systems.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHistory and advancements in chemistry · Complex Systems and Decision Making
