Pattern-Guided Integrated Gradients
Robert Schwarzenberg, Steffen Castle

TL;DR
This paper introduces Pattern-Guided Integrated Gradients (PGIG), a novel explainability method for neural networks that combines two established techniques, inheriting their strengths and passing stress tests, outperforming other methods in image degradation benchmarks.
Contribution
The paper proposes PGIG, a new explainability method that integrates Integrated Gradients and PatternAttribution, improving robustness and performance over existing approaches.
Findings
PGIG passes stress tests that original methods fail.
PGIG outperforms nine alternative explainability methods in large-scale image degradation experiments.
PGIG inherits properties from both parent methods, enhancing explainability.
Abstract
Integrated Gradients (IG) and PatternAttribution (PA) are two established explainability methods for neural networks. Both methods are theoretically well-founded. However, they were designed to overcome different challenges. In this work, we combine the two methods into a new method, Pattern-Guided Integrated Gradients (PGIG). PGIG inherits important properties from both parent methods and passes stress tests that the originals fail. In addition, we benchmark PGIG against nine alternative explainability approaches (including its parent methods) in a large-scale image degradation experiment and find that it outperforms all of them.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) · Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning · Advanced Neural Network Applications
