Testing linear inequalities of subgraph statistics
Lior Gishboliner, Asaf Shapira, Henrique Stagni

TL;DR
This paper investigates the testability of linear inequalities involving subgraph densities in graphs, disproving a conjecture that such properties are always testable and showing some are not testable even in the classical model.
Contribution
The paper proves that certain properties defined by linear inequalities of subgraph densities are not testable, countering previous conjectures and expanding understanding of property testing limitations.
Findings
Some properties defined by linear inequalities of subgraph densities are not testable.
Disproves the conjecture that all such properties are testable in the classical model.
Uses a novel approach encoding quasirandomness via linear inequalities.
Abstract
Property testers are fast randomized algorithms whose task is to distinguish between inputs satisfying some predetermined property and those that are far from satisfying it. Since these algorithms operate by inspecting a small randomly selected portion of the input, the most natural property one would like to be able to test is whether the input does not contain certain forbidden small substructures. In the setting of graphs, such a result was obtained by Alon et al., who proved that for any finite family of graphs , the property of being induced -free (i.e. not containing an induced copy of any ) is testable. It is natural to ask if one can go one step further and prove that more elaborate properties involving induced subgraphs are also testable. One such generalization of the result of Alon et al. was formulated by Goldreich and Shinkar…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
