Exploring the landscape of heterotic strings on T^d
Anamar\'ia Font, Bernardo Fraiman, Mariana Gra\~na, Carmen A., N\'u\~nez, H\'ector Parra De Freitas

TL;DR
This paper analyzes heterotic string compactifications on T^d, providing criteria for gauge group realization, exploring moduli space algorithms, and confirming duality predictions with F-theory on K3 surfaces.
Contribution
It introduces lattice embedding criteria and algorithms to determine gauge groups and moduli in heterotic T^d compactifications, advancing understanding of string dualities.
Findings
Classified all maximally enhanced gauge groups for d=1,2.
Established criteria for gauge group realization via lattice embeddings.
Confirmed duality correspondence between heterotic T^2 compactifications and elliptic K3 surfaces.
Abstract
Compactifications of the heterotic string on T^d are the simplest, yet rich enough playgrounds to uncover swampland ideas: the U(1)^{d+16} left-moving gauge symmetry gets enhanced at special points in moduli space only to certain groups. We state criteria, based on lattice embedding techniques, to establish whether a gauge group is realized or not. For generic d, we further show how to obtain the moduli that lead to a given gauge group by modifying the method of deleting nodes in the extended Dynkin diagram of the Narain lattice II_{1,17}. More general algorithms to explore the moduli space are also developed. For d=1 and 2 we list all the maximally enhanced gauge groups, moduli, and other relevant information about the embedding in II_{d,d+16}. In agreement with the duality between heterotic on T^2 and F-theory on K3, all possible gauge groups on T^2 match all possible ADE types of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
