Multi-stage Power Scheduling Framework for Data Center with Chilled Water Storage in Energy and Regulation Markets

TL;DR

This paper introduces a multi-stage control and scheduling framework for data centers with chilled water storage, enabling cost savings and regulation revenue through synergistic energy and regulation market participation.

Contribution

It develops a novel three-stage model predictive control-based scheduling framework for thermal energy storage in data centers to optimize costs and regulation services.

Findings

Up to 8.8% reduction in operational costs.

Increased regulation capacity bid and revenue.

Significant energy and demand cost savings.

Abstract

Leveraging electrochemical and thermal energy storage systems has been proposed as a strategy to reduce peak power in data centers. Thermal energy storage systems, such as chilled water tanks, have gained increasing attention in data centers for load shifting due to their relatively small capital and operational costs compared to electrochemical energy storage. However, there are few studies investigating the possibility of utilizing thermal energy storage system with resources to provide ancillary services (e.g., frequency regulation) to the grid. This paper proposes a synergistic control strategy for the data center with a chilled water storage providing frequency regulation service by adjusting the chiller capacity, storage charging rate, and IT server CPU frequency. Then, a three-stage multi-market scheduling framework based on a model predictive control scheme is developed to minimize operational costs of data centers participating in both energy and regulation markets. The framework solves a power baseline scheduling problem, a regulation reserve problem, and a real-time power signal tracking problem sequentially. Simulation results show that utilizing the thermal energy storage can increase the regulation capacity bid, reduce energy costs and demand charges, and also harvest frequency regulation revenues. The proposed multi-market scheduling framework in a span of two days can reduce the operational costs up to 8.8% ($1,606.4) compared to the baseline with 0.2% (\$38.7) energy cost reduction, 6.5% (\$1,179.4) from demand reduction, and 2.1% (\$338.3) from regulation revenues.