Only Time Will Tell: Credible Dynamic Signaling
Egor Starkov (University of Copenhagen)

TL;DR
This paper analyzes dynamic signaling without commitment, showing that informative equilibria can exist through attrition, with applications to bargaining, pricing, and labor markets.
Contribution
It provides a sharp characterization of separating equilibria in dynamic signaling models with minimal assumptions, emphasizing attrition as the main signaling mechanism.
Findings
Informative equilibria can exist without off-path beliefs.
Signaling occurs through attrition, with weak types mixing strategies.
Applications demonstrate the model's relevance to bargaining, pricing, and labor markets.
Abstract
This paper characterizes informational outcomes in a model of dynamic signaling with vanishing commitment power. It shows that contrary to popular belief, informative equilibria with payoff-relevant signaling can exist without requiring unreasonable off-path beliefs. The paper provides a sharp characterization of possible separating equilibria: all signaling must take place through attrition, when the weakest type mixes between revealing own type and pooling with the stronger types. The framework explored in the paper is general, imposing only minimal assumptions on payoff monotonicity and single-crossing. Applications to bargaining, monopoly price signaling, and labor market signaling are developed to demonstrate the results in specific contexts.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
