Fidelity of time-bin entangled multi-photon states from a quantum emitter
Konstantin Tiurev, Pol Llopart Mirambell, Mikkel Bloch Lauritzen,, Martin Hayhurst Appel, Alexey Tiranov, Peter Lodahl, Anders S{\o}ndberg, S{\o}rensen

TL;DR
This paper develops a mathematical framework to evaluate the fidelity of multi-photon entangled states generated by solid-state quantum emitters, accounting for various physical and technological imperfections affecting their quality.
Contribution
It introduces a formalism for assessing entangled state fidelity from quantum emitters, considering real-world imperfections and providing a basis for practical implementation analysis.
Findings
Analyzes effects of phonon dephasing and nuclear spin interactions on fidelity.
Quantifies impact of photon losses and filtering imperfections.
Provides a method to evaluate achievable fidelities with current technology.
Abstract
We devise a mathematical framework for assessing the fidelity of multi-photon entangled states generated by a single solid-state quantum emitter, such as a quantum dot or a nitrogen-vacancy center. Within this formalism, we theoretically study the role of imperfections present in real systems on the generation of time-bin encoded Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger and one-dimensional cluster states. We consider both fundamental limitations, such as the effect of phonon-induced dephasing, interaction with the nuclear spin bath, and second-order emissions, as well as technological imperfections, such as branching effects, non-perfect filtering, and photon losses. In a companion paper, we consider a particular physical implementation based on a quantum dot emitter embedded in a photonic crystal waveguide and apply our theoretical formalism to assess the fidelities achievable with current…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
