Follow-up Studies of Five Cataclysmic Variable Candidates Discovered by LAMOST
John R. Thorstensen

TL;DR
This study provides follow-up observations of five LAMOST-discovered cataclysmic variable candidates, revealing diverse properties and confirming orbital periods, thereby uncovering new CVs previously unrecognized due to modest photometric variations.
Contribution
It offers detailed characterization and confirmation of orbital periods for five CV candidates from LAMOST, highlighting their diversity and the potential of spectroscopic selection.
Findings
Confirmed orbital periods for all five CV candidates.
Identified a unique propeller system with an early-M secondary.
Discovered some CVs with modest photometric variations previously unnoticed.
Abstract
We report follow-up observations of five cataclysmic variable candidates from LAMOST published by Hou et al. (2020). LAMOST J024048.51+195226.9 is the most unusual of the five; an early-M type secondary star contributes strongly to its spectrum, and its spectral and photometric behavior are strikingly reminiscent of the hitherto-unique propeller system AE Aqr. We confirm that a 7.34-hr period discovered in the Catalina survey data (Drake et al. 2014) is orbital. Another object, LAMOST J204305.95+341340.6 appears to be a near twin of the novalike variable V795 Her, with an orbital period in the so-called 2-3 hour "gap". LAMOST J035913.61+405035.0 is evidently an eclipsing, weakly-outbursting dwarf nova with a 5.48-hr period. Our spectrum of LAMOST J090150.09+375444.3 is dominated by a late-type secondary and shows weak, narrow Balmer emission moving in phase with the absorption lines,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
