The Close Binary Fraction as a Function of Stellar Parameters in APOGEE: A Strong Anti-Correlation With $\alpha$ Abundances
Christine N. Mazzola, Carles Badenes, Maxwell Moe, Sergey E. Koposov,, Marina Kounkel, Kaitlin Kratter, Kevin Covey, Matthew G. Walker, Todd A., Thompson, Brett Andrews, Peter E. Freeman, Borja Anguiano, Joleen K., Carlberg, Nathan M. De Lee, Peter M. Frinchaboy, Hannah M. Lewis

TL;DR
This study uses APOGEE data to reveal that the close binary fraction of stars strongly anti-correlates with alpha-element abundances, indicating chemical composition influences stellar multiplicity more than other parameters.
Contribution
It uncovers a steep anti-correlation between alpha-element abundances and close binary fraction, highlighting the role of chemical composition in stellar multiplicity.
Findings
Close binary fraction decreases with increasing alpha-element abundance.
Anti-correlation between alpha-elements and multiplicity is steeper than that with iron.
Bias-corrected close binary fraction drops from ~100% to ~15% across alpha abundance range.
Abstract
We use observations from the APOGEE survey to explore the relationship between stellar parameters and multiplicity. We combine high-resolution repeat spectroscopy for 41,363 dwarf and subgiant stars with abundance measurements from the APOGEE pipeline and distances and stellar parameters derived using \textit{Gaia} DR2 parallaxes from \cite{Sanders2018} to identify and characterise stellar multiples with periods below 30 years, corresponding to \drvm 3 \kms, where \drvm\ is the maximum APOGEE-detected shift in the radial velocities. Chemical composition is responsible for most of the variation in the close binary fraction in our sample, with stellar parameters like mass and age playing a secondary role. In addition to the previously identified strong anti-correlation between the close binary fraction and \feh\, we find that high abundances of elements also suppress…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
