The Completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Pairwise-Inverse-Probability and Angular Correction for Fibre Collisions in Clustering Measurements
Faizan G. Mohammad, Will J. Percival, Hee-Jong Seo, Michael J., Chapman, D. Bianchi, Ashley J. Ross, Cheng Zhao, Dustin Lang, Julian, Bautista, Jonathan Brinkmann, Joel R. Brownstein, Etienne Burtin, Chia-Hsun, Chuang, Kyle S. Dawson, Sylvain de la Torre, Arnaud de Mattia, Sarah

TL;DR
This paper introduces new correction techniques for fibre collision effects in galaxy clustering measurements, enabling more accurate small-scale analyses in large spectroscopic surveys like SDSS-IV eBOSS.
Contribution
It presents the pairwise-inverse-probability and angular up-weighting methods to correct for fibre collisions, improving the accuracy of clustering measurements down to 0.1 Mpc/h.
Findings
Unbiased measurements of $w_p$ and $\xi^l$ down to 0.1 Mpc/h.
Corrected small-scale clustering enables better cosmological constraints.
Approximate methods suffice for large-scale measurements, but new methods access small scales.
Abstract
The completed eBOSS catalogues contain redshifts of 344080 QSOs over 0.8<z<2.2 covering 4808 deg, 174816 LRGs over 0.6<z<1.0 covering 4242 deg and 173736 ELGs over 0.6<z<1.1 covering 1170 deg in order to constrain the expansion history of the Universe and the growth rate of structure through clustering measurements. Mechanical limitations of the fibre-fed spectrograph on the Sloan telescope prevent two fibres being placed closer than 62", the fibre-collision scale, in a single pass of the instrument on the sky. These `fibre collisions' strongly correlate with the intrinsic clustering of targets and can bias measurements of the two-point correlation function resulting in a systematic error on the inferred values of the cosmological parameters. We combine the new techniques of pairwise-inverse-probability weighting and the angular up-weighting to correct the clustering…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
