The Completed SDSS-IV Extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: N-body Mock Challenge for the Quasar Sample

TL;DR

This paper validates redshift space distortion models used in SDSS eBOSS quasar clustering analysis through N-body mock challenges, confirming their accuracy and systematic errors for cosmological measurements.

Contribution

It provides a comprehensive validation of RSD models with mock catalogues, quantifying their systematic errors for the final SDSS DR16 quasar analysis.

Findings

Models recover $f\sigma_8$ within 3% for non-blind mocks.

Systematic errors are quantified as ~0.013 for $f\sigma_8$.

Models perform well with similar errors across different mock types.

Abstract

The growth rate and expansion history of the Universe can be measured from large galaxy redshift surveys using the Alcock-Paczynski effect. We validate the Redshift Space Distortion models used in the final analysis of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (eBOSS) Data Release 16 quasar clustering sample, in configuration and Fourier space, using a series of HOD mock catalogues generated using the OuterRim N-body simulation. We test three models on a series of non-blind mocks, in the OuterRim cosmology, and blind mocks, which have been rescaled to new cosmologies, and investigate the effects of redshift smearing and catastrophic redshifts. We find that for the non-blind mocks, the models are able to recover $f\sigma_8$ to within 3% and $\alpha_\parallel$ and $\alpha_\bot$ to within 1%. The scatter in the measurements is larger for the blind mocks, due to the assumption of an incorrect fiducial cosmology. From this mock challenge, we find that all three models perform well, with similar systematic errors on $f\sigma_8$, $\alpha_\parallel$ and $\alpha_\bot$ at the level of $\sigma_{f\sigma_8}=0.013$, $\sigma_{\alpha_\parallel}=0.012$ and $\sigma_{\alpha_\bot}=0.008$. The systematic error on the combined consensus is $\sigma_{f\sigma_8}=0.011$, $\sigma_{\alpha_\parallel}=0.008$ and $\sigma_{\alpha_\bot}=0.005$, which is used in the final DR16 analysis. For BAO fits in configuration and Fourier space, we take conservative systematic errors of $\sigma_{\alpha_\parallel}=0.010$ and $\sigma_{\alpha_\bot}=0.007$.