The completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: 1000 multi-tracer mock catalogues with redshift evolution and systematics for galaxies and quasars of the final data release
Cheng Zhao, Chia-Hsun Chuang, Julian Bautista, Arnaud de Mattia, Anand, Raichoor, Ashley J. Ross, Jiamin Hou, Richard Neveux, Charling Tao, Etienne, Burtin, Kyle S. Dawson, Sylvain de la Torre, H\'ector Gil-Mar\'in, Jean-Paul, Kneib, Will J. Percival, Graziano Rossi

TL;DR
This paper presents the creation of 1000 synthetic galaxy and quasar catalogues for the eBOSS DR16 survey, accurately modeling clustering and systematics to improve covariance estimates and analysis robustness.
Contribution
It introduces a fast, effective method to generate realistic multi-tracer mock catalogues with redshift evolution and systematics for large-scale structure analysis.
Findings
Mocks reproduce clustering statistics within 1 sigma of data
Accurate covariance matrices enable reliable multi-tracer analysis
Method efficiently models systematics and gravitational evolution
Abstract
We produce 1000 realizations of synthetic clustering catalogues for each type of the tracers used for the baryon acoustic oscillation and redshift space distortion analysis of the Sloan Digital Sky Surveys-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey final data release (eBOSS DR16), covering the redshift range from 0.6 to 2.2, to provide reliable estimates of covariance matrices and test the robustness of the analysis pipeline with respect to observational systematics. By extending the Zel'dovich approximation density field with an effective tracer bias model calibrated with the clustering measurements from the observational data, we accurately reproduce the two- and three-point clustering statistics of the eBOSS DR16 tracers, including their cross-correlations in redshift space with very low computational costs. In addition, we include the gravitational evolution of structures…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
