Dominated Minimal Separators are Tame (Nearly All Others are Feral)
Peter Gartland, Daniel Lokshtanov

TL;DR
This paper studies the complexity of minimal separators in hereditary graph classes, classifying them as tame or feral, and provides new classifications and counterexamples related to the exclusion of certain substructures.
Contribution
It disproves a conjecture about $k$-creatures implying tameness and offers a comprehensive classification of hereditary classes based on forbidden induced subgraphs.
Findings
Counterexample to the $k$-creatures conjecture.
Complete classification of hereditary classes with finite forbidden subgraphs.
Hereditary classes excluding $k$-creatures and large cycles or complete graphs are tame.
Abstract
A class of graphs is called {\em tame} if there exists a constant so that every graph in on vertices contains at most minimal separators, {\em strongly-quasi-tame} if every graph in on vertices contains at most minimal separators, and {\em feral} if there exists a constant so that contains -vertex graphs with at least minimal separators for arbitrarily large . The classification of graph classes into tame or feral has numerous algorithmic consequences, and has recently received considerable attention. A key graph-theoretic object in the quest for such a classification is the notion of a -{\em creature}. In a recent manuscript [Abrishami et al., Arxiv 2020] conjecture that every hereditary class that excludes -creatures for some fixed constant is tame. We give a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
