Government spending and multi-category treatment effects:The modified conditional independence assumption
Koiti Yano

TL;DR
This paper introduces a modified conditional independence assumption within a potential outcome framework to better evaluate multi-category fiscal policy effects, revealing nuanced impacts of government spending on economic growth.
Contribution
It proposes a novel modified assumption for treatment effect evaluation and applies it to analyze US fiscal policy impacts from 1992 to 2019.
Findings
Large fiscal contractions negatively impact economic growth.
Small and large fiscal expansions positively impact growth.
Traditional regression methods do not detect these effects.
Abstract
I devise a novel approach to evaluate the effectiveness of fiscal policy in the short run with multi-category treatment effects and inverse probability weighting based on the potential outcome framework. This study's main contribution to the literature is the proposed modified conditional independence assumption to improve the evaluation of fiscal policy. Using this approach, I analyze the effects of government spending on the US economy from 1992 to 2019. The empirical study indicates that large fiscal contraction generates a negative effect on the economic growth rate, and small and large fiscal expansions realize a positive effect. However, these effects are not significant in the traditional multiple regression approach. I conclude that this new approach significantly improves the evaluation of fiscal policy.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFiscal Policy and Economic Growth · Advanced Causal Inference Techniques · Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
