Degrees of individual and groupwise backward and forward responsibility in extensive-form games with ambiguity, and their application to social choice problems
Jobst Heitzig, Sarah Hiller

TL;DR
This paper develops quantitative responsibility metrics within extensive-form game frameworks to assess moral responsibility in complex social choice scenarios involving uncertainty, highlighting the challenges in identifying an optimal metric.
Contribution
It introduces a set of responsibility metrics based on probability within an axiomatic framework for extensive-form games, applied to social choice problems with uncertainty.
Findings
Most desirable properties can be fulfilled by some metric variant
No single metric clearly outperforms others in all aspects
Responsibility assessment remains complex with no definitive optimal metric
Abstract
Many real-world situations of ethical relevance, in particular those of large-scale social choice such as mitigating climate change, involve not only many agents whose decisions interact in complicated ways, but also various forms of uncertainty, including quantifiable risk and unquantifiable ambiguity. In such problems, an assessment of individual and groupwise moral responsibility for ethically undesired outcomes or their responsibility to avoid such is challenging and prone to the risk of under- or overdetermination of responsibility. In contrast to existing approaches based on strict causation or certain deontic logics that focus on a binary classification of `responsible' vs `not responsible', we here present several different quantitative responsibility metrics that assess responsibility degrees in units of probability. For this, we use a framework based on an adapted version of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Risk Perception and Management · Free Will and Agency
