Re-ranking for Writer Identification and Writer Retrieval
Simon Jordan, Mathias Seuret, Pavel Kr\'al, Ladislav Lenc, Ji\v{r}\'i, Mart\'inek, Barbara Wiermann, Tobias Schwinger, Andreas Maier, Vincent, Christlein

TL;DR
This paper introduces re-ranking techniques based on k-reciprocal nearest neighbors to improve writer identification and retrieval accuracy, demonstrating significant gains on multiple datasets despite limited samples per writer.
Contribution
It is the first to apply re-ranking methods to writer identification, showing their effectiveness even with small sample sizes.
Findings
Re-ranking improves mAP in writer identification tasks.
k-reciprocal re-ranking outperforms baseline methods.
Both vector encoding and query-expansion techniques are effective.
Abstract
Automatic writer identification is a common problem in document analysis. State-of-the-art methods typically focus on the feature extraction step with traditional or deep-learning-based techniques. In retrieval problems, re-ranking is a commonly used technique to improve the results. Re-ranking refines an initial ranking result by using the knowledge contained in the ranked result, e. g., by exploiting nearest neighbor relations. To the best of our knowledge, re-ranking has not been used for writer identification/retrieval. A possible reason might be that publicly available benchmark datasets contain only few samples per writer which makes a re-ranking less promising. We show that a re-ranking step based on k-reciprocal nearest neighbor relationships is advantageous for writer identification, even if only a few samples per writer are available. We use these reciprocal relationships in…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
