Local Sufficiency for Partial Strategyproofness
Timo Mennle, Sven Seuken

TL;DR
This paper explores the relationship between local and global partial strategyproofness in assignment mechanisms, establishing tight polynomial bounds and unifying previous local sufficiency results for strategyproofness.
Contribution
It proves that r-local partial strategyproofness implies r^2-partial strategyproofness, providing the tightest polynomial bound and unifying prior local sufficiency results.
Findings
r-local partial strategyproofness implies r^2-partial strategyproofness
The polynomial bound r^2 is tight for this implication
Unifies previous local sufficiency results for strategyproofness
Abstract
In (Mennle and Seuken, 2017), we have introduced partial strategyproofness, a new, relaxed notion of strategyproofness, to study the incentive properties of non-strategyproof assignment mechanisms. In this paper, we present results pertaining to local sufficiency for partial strategyproofness: We show that, for any r in [0,1], r-local partial strategyproofness implies r^2-partial strategyproofness, and we show that this is the tightest polynomial bound for which a guarantee can be proven. Our results unify the two prior local sufficiency results for strategyproofness (Carroll, 2012) and lexicographic dominance-strategyproofness (Cho, 2012).
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAuction Theory and Applications · Game Theory and Voting Systems · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
