On the Effective Capacity of IRS-assisted wireless communication
Waqas Aman, M. Mahboob Ur Rahman, Shuja Ansari, Ali Arshad Nasir,, Khalid Qaraqe, M. Ali Imran, Qammer H. Abbasi

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the effective capacity of IRS-assisted wireless systems under different CSI assumptions, deriving closed-form expressions and optimizing transmission rates, to evaluate system performance in various configurations.
Contribution
It provides the first comprehensive derivation of effective capacity expressions for IRS-assisted systems with perfect and no CSI, including optimization methods for no CSI scenarios.
Findings
Effective capacity depends on system parameters like QoS exponent and IRS elements.
Closed-form EC expressions are derived for both SISO and MISO systems.
Optimal transmission rate can be found via gradient descent in no CSI cases.
Abstract
We consider futuristic, intelligent reflecting surfaces (IRS)-aided communication between a base station (BS) and a user equipment (UE) for two distinct scenarios: a single-input, single-output (SISO) system whereby the BS has a single antenna, and a multi-input, single-output (MISO) system whereby the BS has multiple antennas. For the considered IRS-assisted downlink, we compute the effective capacity (EC), which is a quantitative measure of the statistical quality-of-service (QoS) offered by a communication system experiencing random fading. For our analysis, we consider the two widely-known assumptions on channel state information (CSI) -- i.e., perfect CSI and no CSI, at the BS. Thereafter, we first derive the distribution of the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for both SISO and MISO scenarios, and subsequently derive closed-form expressions for the EC under perfect CSI and no CSI…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
