The first broadband X-ray view of the narrow line Seyfert 1 Ton S180
G. A. Matzeu, E. Nardini, M. L. Parker, J. N. Reeves, V. Braito, D., Porquet, R. Middei, E. Kammoun, E. Lusso, W. N. Alston, M. Giustini, A. P., Lobban, A. M. Joyce, Z. Igo, J. Ebrero, L. Ballo, M. Santos-Lle\'o, N., Schartel

TL;DR
This study provides the first broad X-ray spectrum of Ton S180, revealing complex emission components and suggesting super-Eddington accretion with potential wind evidence, challenging simple reflection models.
Contribution
It introduces a comprehensive broadband X-ray analysis of Ton S180, proposing a multi-component emission model with two distinct coronae and super-Eddington accretion, which is novel for this galaxy.
Findings
Relativistic reflection models cannot fully explain the spectrum.
Soft excess is best explained by warm Comptonization.
Evidence suggests super-Eddington accretion and possible wind presence.
Abstract
We present joint \textit{XMM-Newton} and \textit{NuSTAR} observations of the `bare' narrow line Seyfert 1 Ton S180 (), carried out in 2016 and providing the first hard X-ray view of this luminous galaxy. We find that the 0.4--30 keV band cannot be self-consistently reproduced by relativistic reflection models, which fail to account simultaneously for the soft and hard X-ray emission. The smooth soft excess prefers extreme blurring parameters, confirmed by the nearly featureless nature of the RGS spectrum, while the moderately broad Fe K line and the modest hard excess above 10 keV appear to arise in a milder gravity regime. By allowing a different origin of the soft excess, the broadband X-ray spectrum and overall spectral energy distribution (SED) are well explained by a combination of: (a) direct thermal emission from the accretion disc, dominating from the optical to the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
