A precise architecture characterization of the $\pi$ Men planetary system
M. Damasso, A. Sozzetti, C. Lovis, S. C. C. Barros, S. G. Sousa, O. D., S. Demangeon, J. P. Faria, J. Lillo-Box, S. Cristiani, F. Pepe, R. Rebolo, N., C. Santos, M. R. Zapatero Osorio, J. I. Gonz\'alez Hern\'andez, M. Amate, L., Pasquini, F. M. Zerbi, V. Adibekyan, M. Abreu

TL;DR
This study uses high-precision ESPRESSO spectrograph data combined with TESS photometry and astrometry to precisely characterize the $ au$ Men planetary system, revealing detailed planetary parameters and orbital misalignment.
Contribution
It provides the first precise characterization of the $ au$ Men system using ESPRESSO, TESS, and Gaia data, including orbital inclinations and masses.
Findings
Precise mass and orbital parameters for $ au$ Men c and b.
Detection limits exclude additional low-mass companions within certain orbits.
High orbital misalignment between $ au$ Men b and c.
Abstract
The bright star Men was chosen as the first target for a radial velocity follow-up to test the performance of ESPRESSO, the new high-resolution spectrograph at the ESO's Very-Large Telescope (VLT). The star hosts a multi-planet system (a transiting 4 M planet at 0.07 au, and a sub-stellar companion on a 2100-day eccentric orbit) which is particularly appealing for a precise multi-technique characterization. With the new ESPRESSO observations, that cover a time span of 200 days, we aim to improve the precision and accuracy of the planet parameters and search for additional low-mass companions. We also take advantage of new photometric transits of Men c observed by TESS over a time span that overlaps with that of the ESPRESSO follow-up campaign. We analyse the enlarged spectroscopic and photometric datasets and compare the results to those in the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
