Comparing the reflectivity of ungrouped carbonaceous chondrites with that of short period comets like 2P/Encke
Safoura Tanbakouei, Josep M. Trigo-Rodriguez, Jurgen blum, Iwan, Williams, Jordi Llorca

TL;DR
This study compares the reflectance spectra of comet 2P/Encke with Antarctic carbonaceous chondrites to identify potential meteorite proxies, highlighting the importance for future comet sample-return missions and impact hazard mitigation.
Contribution
It identifies specific anomalous carbonaceous chondrites as potential proxies for comet 2P/Encke's material, advancing understanding of evolved comet compositions.
Findings
Two meteorites, Meteorite Hills 01017 and Grosvenor Mountains 95551, match comet 2P/Encke's spectral features.
Common carbonaceous chondrites do not match the comet's spectral profile.
Further studies and sample-return missions are needed to confirm comet material composition.
Abstract
Aims. The existence of asteroid complexes produced by the disruption of these comets suggests that evolved comets could also produce high-strength materials able to survive as meteorites. We chose as an example comet 2P/Encke, one of the largest object of the so-called Taurid complex. We compare the reflectance spectrum of this comet with the laboratory spectra of some Antarctic ungrouped carbonaceous chondrites to investigate whether some of these meteorites could be associated with evolved comets. Methods. We compared the spectral behaviour of 2P/Encke with laboratory spectra of carbonaceous chondrites. Different specimens of the common carbonaceous chondrite groups do not match the overall features and slope of comet 2P/Encke. Trying anomalous carbonaceous chondrites, we found two meteorites, Meteorite Hills 01017 and Grosvenor Mountains 95551, which could be good proxies for the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
