Electron Dynamics near Diamagnetic Regions of Comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko
H. Madanian, J.L. Burch, A.I. Eriksson, T.E. Cravens, M. Galand, E., Vigren, R. Goldstein, Z. Nemeth, P. Mokashi, I. Richter, M. Rubin

TL;DR
This study analyzes electron behavior near diamagnetic regions of comet 67P, revealing how electron densities and pitch angle distributions change, influenced by magnetic field variations and solar wind interactions, based on Rosetta data.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed statistical analysis of electron dynamics near diamagnetic regions of comet 67P, highlighting the effects of magnetic field decay on electron transport and distribution.
Findings
Electron densities correlate with local neutral density.
Suprathermal electron flux decreases within diamagnetic regions.
Electron pitch angle distributions become field-aligned near boundaries.
Abstract
The Rosetta spacecraft detected transient and sporadic diamagnetic regions around comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko. In this paper we present a statistical analysis of bulk and suprathermal electron dynamics, as well as a case study of suprathermal electron pitch angle distributions (PADs) near a diamagnetic region. Bulk electron densities are correlated with the local neutral density and we find a distinct enhancement in electron densities measured over the southern latitudes of the comet. Flux of suprathermal electrons with energies between tens of eV to a couple of hundred eV decreases each time the spacecraft enters a diamagnetic region. We propose a mechanism in which this reduction can be explained by solar wind electrons that are tied to the magnetic field and after having been transported adiabatically in a decaying magnetic field environment, have limited access to the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
