Less than the sum of its parts: the dust-corrected H$\alpha$ luminosity of star-forming galaxies explored at different spatial resolutions with MaNGA and MUSE
N. Vale Asari, V. Wild, A. L. de Amorim, A. Werle, Y. Zheng, R., Kennicutt, B. D. Johnson, M. Galametz, E. W. Pellegrini, R. S. Klessen, S., Reissl, S. C. O. Glover, D. Rahner

TL;DR
This study examines how dust attenuation variations within galaxies lead to underestimation of global Hα luminosities when using integrated spectra, highlighting the importance of spatial resolution in accurate dust correction.
Contribution
It demonstrates that global dust correction systematically underestimates Hα luminosity, especially at higher spatial resolutions, and quantifies this effect using MaNGA and MUSE data.
Findings
Global dust correction underestimates Hα luminosity by 2-4% at 1-2 kpc resolution.
At 36 pc resolution, the discrepancy increases to about 14%.
The true effect depends on spatial variance of dust and Hα luminosity relations.
Abstract
The H and H emission line luminosities measured in a single integrated spectrum are affected in non-trivial ways by point-to-point variations in dust attenuation in a galaxy. This work investigates the impact of this variation when estimating global H luminosities corrected for the presence of dust by a global Balmer decrement. Analytical arguments show that the dust-corrected H luminosity is always underestimated when using the global H/H flux ratio to correct for dust attenuation. We measure this effect on 156 face-on star-forming galaxies from the Mapping Nearby Galaxies at APO (MaNGA) survey. At 1-2 kpc spatial resolution, the effect is small but systematic, with the integrated dust-corrected H luminosity underestimated by - per cent (and typically not more than by per cent), and depends on the specific star formation…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
